Emery v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.
After jury verdict for $51,500 in plaintiff’s favor in this negligence case, the trial judge granted defendant railroad judgment non obstante veredicto.. We review this judgment on plaintiff’s appeal, as we would a granted motion for directed verdict of no cause, by examining the proofs in the light most favorable to plaintiff to determine whether there were any proofs based upon which a jury properly could return a verdict for plaintiff. Barnebee v. Spence Brothers, 367 Mich 46.
Decision in this appeal has required our consideration of the circumstances in which a jury must be allowed to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Schoepper v. Hancock Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Carver v. Detroit & Saline Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Schedlbauer v. Chris-Craft Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Davidson v. Baker-Vander Veen Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Koch v. Southern Pacific CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Baldinger v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Ebel v. Saginaw County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.