Legal Opinion

Emery v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1964No. Calendar 49, Docket 49,800PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

After jury verdict for $51,500 in plaintiff’s favor in this negligence case, the trial judge granted defendant railroad judgment non obstante veredicto.. We review this judgment on plaintiff’s appeal, as we would a granted motion for directed verdict of no cause, by examining the proofs in the light most favorable to plaintiff to determine whether there were any proofs based upon which a jury properly could return a verdict for plaintiff. Barnebee v. Spence Brothers, 367 Mich 46.

Decision in this appeal has required our consideration of the circumstances in which a jury must be allowed to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Schoepper v. Hancock Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Carver v. Detroit & Saline Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Schedlbauer v. Chris-Craft Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Davidson v. Baker-Vander Veen Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Koch v. Southern Pacific CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Baldinger v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ebel v. Saginaw County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API