Legal Opinion
State v. Daoud
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 3, 2009No. 2008-206PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The defendant, Mohamed Daoud, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Abramson, J.) denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.
The following facts are not in dispute or are supported by the record. The defendant was charged by complaint in Manchester District Court with one misdemeanor count of unlawful possession of marijuana, a controlled drug. See RSA 318-B:2,1 (2004). He was also charged by indictment in superior court with one felony count of driving a motor vehicle while certified as a habitual offender. See RSA 262:23 (2004). Both charges arise out of events that occurred on the morning…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- State v. BeauchesneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- United States v. Louis D. TarantolaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JoyceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. Sean McInnisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State of New Hampshire v. Ernest JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020