Legal Opinion

State v. Sean McInnis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 13, 2017No. 2015-0480PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.

Following a bench trial based upon stipulated facts, the defendant, Sean McInnis, was convicted on two counts of possession of a controlled drug. See RSA 318-B:2, I (2011). On appeal, he challenges his convictions, arguing that the Superior Court (Tucker, J.) erroneously denied his motion to suppress. We affirm.

The following facts are drawn from the trial court’s order, or are otherwise found in the record. In November 2009, the defendant pleaded guilty to one count of willful concealment/shoplifting (shoplifting) and was sentenced to pay $744 in fines. See RSA 644:17 (2007) (current version…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. ButlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. State v. BrodeurSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Edward G. ProctorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  2. State v. Jose Batista-SalvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  3. State v. Sean F. StaceySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  4. State v. Shawn PlantamuroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  5. State of New Hampshire v. Corey V. DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API