G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. Tait
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Colorado. Tried below before the Hon. Everett Lewis.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
The petition in this case avers, and the proof shows, that the appellant cut ditches along its railway, and from that across the land of another, through which the water that falls on a large area of country is led into a branch, not a running stream except during and immediately after rainfalls, through which it flows upon the land of appellee, thereby forming a lake which, after rains, covers about thirty acres of her land heretofore cultivated.
It appears that the water which would naturally flow through the branch upon the lands of the appellee would form a lake,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haskell v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Van Pelt v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Gulf, Col. & S. F. R'y Co. v. HelsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Hicks v. SillimanIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Sullivan v. DooleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Sanders v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Thomas v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.