Legal Opinion
Pedersen v. Bio-Medical Applications
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 10, 2014No. Civ. No. 12-2649 (RHK/JSM)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Lisa Pedersen alleges in this action that her former employer, Defendant Bio-Medical Applications of Minnesota d/b/a-Fresenius Medical Care (“BMA”), a dialysis company, terminated her employment after she reported that certain blood samples had been improperly handled. She asserts a single claim under the Minnesota Whistleblower Act (“MWA”), Minnesota Statutes § 181.932. BMA now moves for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, its Motion ■ will be granted.
BACKGROUND
The. pertinent facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Jenna Wood v. SatCom Marketing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elkharwily v. Mayo Holding Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Scarborough v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Becker v. Jostens, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Jung v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Mathiason v. Shutterfly, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.