Legal Opinion
Becker v. Jostens, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 26, 2016No. Civil No. 14-5104 (JRT/BRT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge United States District Court
Plaintiff Roger Becker brings this action against his former employer, Defendant Jostens, Inc., alleging that Jostens fired him in retaliation for making protected complaints about workplace sexual harassment, sexual orientation discrimination, retaliation, battery, and criminal disorderly, conduct, all perpetrated by Ann Carr, his supervisor and the sister-in-law of Jostens’ CEO, Charles Mooty. Becker asserts claims under Title VII, the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), and the Minnesota Whistleblower Act…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Castellano, III v. BettsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Sorensen v. BlueSky TelePsych, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023