State v. Jordan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COZORT, Judge.
In this case the defendant contends that physical evidence obtained from the defendant’s vehicle should have been suppressed at trial on the ground that the police officers who stopped the defendant did not have a sufficient reasonable articulable suspicion to justify an investigative stop. We find no error.
The State’s evidence tended to show that on 21 May 1993, Officer Walter McNeill of the Lumberton Police Department received a call that two black males, one wearing dark clothing and the other wearing a green jacket, had just left Pic-N-Pay shoe store after committing an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re J.L.B.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.