State v. Mangum
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ZACHARY, Judge.
*714 Where the trial court's findings of fact were supported by competent evidence, and its conclusions of law were supported by the findings of fact, the trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the stop of his vehicle.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On March 2013 at approximately 6:55 p.m., Lieutenant James Andrews of the Grifton, North Carolina Police Department received an anonymous phone call about an intoxicated person driving a black, *715 four-door Hyundai leaving a Dollar General store and traveling north on Highland Boulevard. Shortly thereafter, Lt.…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CabbagestalkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. HesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.