Donahue v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bn
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Plaintiff’s husband died as a result of injuries received from being struck by one of defendant’s trolley cars at a street crossing in the City of Philadelphia. The jury found for plaintiff in the sum of $25,000, but the court below subsequently entered judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto, based on decedent’s contributory negligence.
Decedent and a companion were in the act of crossing the street at the usual place for pedestrians at the time the accident occurred. The only witness called by plaintiff who had knowledge of what happened before the accident…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cubitt v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Murphy v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Hazlett v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Schmidt v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Blauvelt v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scholl v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Justice v. WeymannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Perry v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Brennen v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Ferencz v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.