Legal Opinion

Ferencz v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1941No. Appeal, 64PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Schaffee,

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the death of her husband, who was struck by a street car of defendant as he was crossing its single track on Duquesne Avenue in the Borough of Duquesne. From judgment entered on a verdict in plaintiff’s favor defendant appeals.

Duquesne Avenue, which runs North and South, is parallel and adjacent to the right-of-way of the Pennsylvania Railroad, upon which there are four tracks. The distance between the easterly rail of the street railway track and the westerly rail of the first track of the railroad is 9…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Wagner v. Somerset County Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Wolf v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. McCracken v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. Philadelphia & Western R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. HAMLEY v. PITTSBURGH RWYS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Weldon v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Hamley v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Anna P. Pieseski, Administratrix of the Estate of John C. Pieseski, Deceased v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation. Anna P. PieseskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API