Richmond v. Post
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Otter Tail county, Baxter, J., denying his motion for a new trial after a verdict of $300 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Action for slander, in which plaintiff secured a verdict. Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The primary question arises out of an objection made by defendant’s counsel to the reception of any evidence under the complaint upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the objection being overruled by the trial court. The plaintiff attempted to set forth four distinct causes of action in the complaint, but at the trial no testimony was offered except as to one. Certainly, if this cause of action was insufficiently…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stroebel v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- St. Peter's Church v. Board of Co. CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
3Cited by9 opinions
- Quinn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- State v. ShippmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Nord v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Ten Broeck v. Journal Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Johnson v. ForceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.