Ten Broeck v. Journal Printing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action for libel, at the trial dismissed upon objection that the complaint did not state a cause of action. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
Defendant printing company publishes the Minneapolis Journal and defendant Colby is in its employ as a reporter. Plaintiff is a physician and surgeon and for some time before August 27, 1922, resided at 4001 Grand avenue south, Minneapolis. On that day, the complaint alleges, defendants published in the Journal the article which, plaintiff claims, charged him with maintaining a brothel and “abortion establishment.” It…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fry v. McCord Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Pratt v. Pioneer Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Petsch v. Dispatch Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Newell v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Richmond v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. KammeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Clare v. FarrellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Cleary v. WebsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Echternacht v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Kervin v. News Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.