People Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
1DissentHerndon, J.
I dissent.
I readily agree, of course, that reasonable minds may differ with respect to the correct answer to the interesting and very important problem presented by this appeal. Nor do I hesitate to concede the persuasiveness of the arguments made in the opinion of my associates. However, my studies have led me to concur generally in a different view which is well expressed by the Attorney General in his opinion filed December 19, 1960, being Opinion No. 60-166, reported in volume 36 Opinions of the Attorney General of California at page 287, and discussed in the majority opinion herein. This…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- City of El Monte v. City of IndustryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Rafferty v. City of CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.