Legal Opinion · Dissent

People Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City of Santa Barbara

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1962No. Civ. 25682Published

1DissentHerndon, J.

I dissent.

I readily agree, of course, that reasonable minds may differ with respect to the correct answer to the interesting and very important problem presented by this appeal. Nor do I hesitate to concede the persuasiveness of the arguments made in the opinion of my associates. However, my studies have led me to concur generally in a different view which is well expressed by the Attorney General in his opinion filed December 19, 1960, being Opinion No. 60-166, reported in volume 36 Opinions of the Attorney General of California at page 287, and discussed in the majority opinion herein. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. City of El Monte v. City of IndustryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Rafferty v. City of CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API