Crenshaw v. . Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The will of the decedent John Johnson was proved in common form, and upon a caveat being filed the issue joined thereby was sent up by the clerk to the next term of the Superior Court for trial. The caveators assigned as reasons why the alleged will was not the will of the decedent: (1) That he was not at the time of its execution, of sound mind and disposing memory; (2) That he was unduly influenced in its execution by those by whom he was surrounded and especially by his wife, the sole devisee and legatee. The first exception of the caveators was to the ruling of his Honor, that it was not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Will of RawlingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Howell v. . SolomonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Willeford v. Bailey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Daniel v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- In Re Will of ThorpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Harrold v. Territory of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954