PENDLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT 16R v. State
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Petitioners seek reconsideration of this court’s opinion in Pendleton School Dist. v. State of Oregon, 347 Or 28, 217 P3d 175 (2009) (Pendleton II). Specifically, petitioners object to the inclusion of a particular sentence in the majority opinion in that case. In that sentence, the majority characterized a part of this court’s earlier opinion in Pendleton School Dist. v. State of Oregon, 345 Or 596, 200 P3d 133 (2009) (Pendleton I) as follows:
“[T]he court also ruled that the provision in Article VIII, section 8, [of the Oregon Constitution,] contemplating a report from the legislature…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pendleton School District 16R v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Pendleton School District 16R v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chernaik v. KitzhaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- De Young v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Vannatta v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.