Legal Opinion

Newbern v. . Fisher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating tbe case: Is a special promise by one, not a party to a note, to save another harmless if be will become surety thereon, an undertaking to answer tbe debt, default or miscarriage of another within tbe meaning of tbe statute of frauds? Tbe question is not new. It is old and vexatious. Tbe decisions are hopelessly in conflict. Notes 1 A. L. R., 383, and 6 Ann. Cas., 671; 25 R. C. L., 524; 25 C. J., 155.

Tbe only uniformity found among tbe decisions relates to a matter of terminology. Tbe “special promise,” mentioned in tbe statute, is regarded as meaning an express…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Nugent v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Anderson v. SpenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Reed v. HolcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. McClaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  2. Balentine v. . GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Brown v. . BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Ebb Corp. v. GliddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Feiler v. RosenbloomCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API