Legal Opinion

Brown v. . Benton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Appellants in tbeir brief seek to avoid liability on the ground that the contract alleged to have been breached is a collateral agreement, resting in parol, and therefore not enforceable under the statute of frauds. C. S., 987. All the evidence is to the contrary. Newbern v. Fisher, 198 N. C., 385, 151 S. E., 875.

Plaintiff has declared upon an original promise not within the statute of frauds. Dozier v. Wood, 208 N. C., 414; Peele v. Powell, 156 N. C., 553, 73 S. E., 234, on rehearing, 161 N. C., 50, 76 S. E., 698; Sheppard v. Newton, 139 N. C., 533, 52 S. E., 143.

The only point mooted on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Peele v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Dozier v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Sheppard v. Newton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Peele v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  2. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Balentine v. . GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Warren v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Goldsmith v. ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API