Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Spence

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7556PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— Mary Sullenger was indicted by the grand! jury of the Gibson Circuit Court for assault and battery with intent to kill, and was in custody upon that charge. Anderson, the appellant, desired to secure her release, and procured Spence, the appellee,to enter into the usual recognizance for her appearance at the next term thereafter of' the said circuit court. To induce the appellee to enter into, the recognizance, the appellant verbally agreed to indemnify him against all loss, and to save him harmless from all liabilities, costs and charges. The recognizance was forfeited, and appellee…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. D'Wolf v. RabaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Johnson v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. Morrison v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Indiana University v. Indiana Bonding & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Board of Commissioners v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API