Legal Opinion

Amador v. Lara

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1979No. 3784PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff, Helen Amador, appeals from a judgment in which the jury awarded her the sum of $2,500.00. We reverse.

For some unaccountable reason, Helen’s Brief-In-Chief follows the Criminal Rules of Appellate Procedure, not the Civil Rules. No Statement of the Case or Statement of Proceedings appear. Other errors and omissions need not be mentioned.

A large percentage of appellate lawyers are oblivious to, or choose to ignore, our rules. Those who fail to read opinions in which criticism flows should receive as much respect from this Court as respect is shown for the rules.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Texas Gulf Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Turrietta v. WycheNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Luxton v. LuxtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Madrid v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Hurst v. Citadel, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. McNeely v. HenryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Daniels Ins., Inc. v. Daon Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API