Legal Opinion

Madrid v. Roybal

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1991No. 11024PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict denying her claim for damages in a slip-and-fall case. The dispositive issue raised on appeal involves the question of whether the trial court erred in refusing to allow plaintiff’s attorney to read a note submitted to the court from the jury during the jury’s deliberations. For the reasons discussed herein, we reverse.

After the case had been submitted to the jury, the bailiff handed the judge a note from the jury. The note, apparently written by several different hands, read:

I am curious if order (E)

Have there been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. El Paso Electric Co. v. Real Estate Mart, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Hurst v. Citadel, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Amador v. LaraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Reimer v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La FargeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Central SEC. and Alarm Co., Inc. v. MehlerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API