Caporal v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
Colonial Ford, Inc. brought this action against Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company. There were several causes of action alleged in the complaint; however, only two were submitted to the jury. These were a cause under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and the second was under the Automobile Dealer Franchise Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1221.
The plaintiff corporation had been a Ford dealer in Utah, and during most of the time here concerned, it was owned by LeGrande Belnap, as the principal owner, and by Marshall Pease who had a contract to buy a forty-nine percent interest from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- George L. Stansifer, Dba Lakewood Sports Cars v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, and J. O. Fisher Corporation (Jim Fisher Motors)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- The Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Randy's Studebaker Sales, Inc., D/B/A Randy's Datsun Sales v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. 50 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Dallas CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- United States v. 77,819.10 Acres Of Land, More Or Less, Situate In Socorro And Catron Counties, New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. 77,819.10 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Caporal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978