Hawkins v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Pickering, J.:
Appellant Collie Hawkins contends that the district court erred by rejecting his challenges to the State’s peremptory challenges of three jurors as impermissible race discrimination under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). On the record and briefs presented, we cannot sustain this claim.
The defense objected to the State’s peremptory challenges, citing Batson. The State responded with ostensibly race-neutral explanations for its juror strikes. In particular, the State justified removing a Middle-Eastern computer science professor from the jury because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Williams v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Artiga-Morales v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014
- Deon Marquiest Kiles v. William Hutchings, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Figueroa (Jose) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2021
- GUITRON (MIGUEL) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.