Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2018No. 70868PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, PICKERING, J.:

*305The United States Constitution prohibits parties from exercising peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race. When a defendant claims that the State has removed a potential juror because of the juror's race, the law requires the district judge to conduct a three-step inquiry. If, after conducting the inquiry, the district judge finds no unlawful discrimination occurred, we give great deference to the district court's finding and will only reverse if the district court clearly erred. But where, as here, the court fails to properly engage that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Randy Ray Pickering v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Cooper v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Stewart Roy Yazzie v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. MATTHEWS (JEMAR) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2020
  5. BURNS (DAVID) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API