Commonwealth v. Bango
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASTILLE, Justice.
This Court granted review in this matter to determine whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by permitting the jury to review transcripts of tape-recorded conversations during its deliberations. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the Superior Court.
On June 12, 1995, appellant was tried before a jury on twenty-eight counts of Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance1 and one count of Criminal Conspiracy.2 The crux of the prosecution’s case against appellant consisted of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. ElderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- United States v. Ramiro MaganaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. MortonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Com. v. Abdul-Ali, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
- Com. v. Barbour, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.