Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 2010No. 73 MAP 2009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice ORIE MELVIN.

We granted allowance of appeal to clarify whether a criminal defendant has the right to be present while deliberating jurors listen to audio-recorded trial testimony and whether jurors are permitted to review such testimony within the confines of the jury deliberation room. These issues arose on collateral review when Appellant, Lucillious Williams, argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object when the trial court allowed the jury to listen to an audio recording of a rape victim’s testimony in the jury room without Appellant or his attorney…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. ReavesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. RenchenskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. BufordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. HunsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API