Legal Opinion
State v. Treat
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 18, 2001No. 19331-4-IIIPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
35 P.3d 1192 (2001)
109 Wash.App. 419
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Everett C. TREAT, Appellant.
No. 19331-4-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.
December 18, 2001.
Philip E. Nino, Spokane, for appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, Spokane, for respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
We will impose a constructive arraignment date when a delay between charging and bringing a defendant before the court is both long and unnecessary. This is the Striker rule. State v. Striker, 87 Wash.2d 870, 557 P.2d 847 (1976). The requirements of Striker only apply, however, when a defendant is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. WickeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Nobel J. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. Ramirez-DominguezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. Ramirez-DominguezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. BUDIKCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. BudikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.