Legal Opinion

Dubin v. Muchnick

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard S. Lane, J.

At the core of this close corporation family feud lie requirements for a supra-majority vote (80%) for the transaction of any business by the stockholders or the directors. These requirements are contained in a written stockholders’ agreement but are not reflected in either the certificate of incorporation or the by-laws.

In the happier days of corporate birth in 1973, plaintiff and one Lester Pape each held 40% and defendant Joseph Caspi held the remaining 20%. Plaintiff was president and he together with Mr. Pape and all three defendants constituted the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Zion v. KurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Long Park, Inc. v. Trenton-New Brunswick Theatres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Fells v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. In re the Election of Directors of William Faehndrich, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SchmittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  2. Dubin v. MuchnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Sutton v. SuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Eckhaus v. MaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  5. Smith v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API