Legal Opinion
Zion v. Kurtz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 29, 1980PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
On these appeals we conclude that when all of the stockholders of a Delaware corporation agree that, except as specified in their agreement, no "business or activities” of the corporation shall be conducted without the consent of a minority stockholder, the agreement is, as between the original parties to it, enforceable even though all formal steps required by the statute have not been taken. We hold further that the agreement made by the parties to this action was violated when the corporation entered into two agreements without the minority stockholder’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Levine v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Margolin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Scottish Air International, Inc. And Murray Vidockler v. British Caledonian Group, Plc, Adam Thomson, Dennis H. Walter, and R. Marshall GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Betty L. Kimmel v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- United States v. Funds Held in the Name or for the Benefit of WettererCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In re Pace Photographers, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Shattenkirk v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.