Ciaramitaro v. Woods
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO CERTAIN NAMED PLAINTIFFS
KENNEDY, District Judge.
The defendants filed a motion to determine that this action not be maintained as a class action and to dismiss as to twenty (20) named plaintiffs because their individual claims did not meet the jurisdictional requirement that more than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) be in controversy.
In a letter dated October 15, 1970 The Honorable Theodore Levin informed the parties that the court had “concluded as a matter of law that the action may not be maintained as a class action because the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Raybould v. Mancini-Fattore CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1960
- Colman v. PitzerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- General Research, Inc. v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE CO.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Freeman v. Gordon & Breach, Science Publishers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Christiansen v. Beneficial National BankDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1997