Legal Opinion

Ciaramitaro v. Woods

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 2, 1971No. Civ. A. 32519PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO CERTAIN NAMED PLAINTIFFS

KENNEDY, District Judge.

The defendants filed a motion to determine that this action not be maintained as a class action and to dismiss as to twenty (20) named plaintiffs because their individual claims did not meet the jurisdictional requirement that more than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) be in controversy.

In a letter dated October 15, 1970 The Honorable Theodore Levin informed the parties that the court had “concluded as a matter of law that the action may not be maintained as a class action because the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
  3. Raybould v. Mancini-Fattore CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1960
  4. Colman v. PitzerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. General Research, Inc. v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE CO.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Uniroyal, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Freeman v. Gordon & Breach, Science Publishers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Christiansen v. Beneficial National BankDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API