Legal Opinion
Raybould v. Mancini-Fattore Company
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 6, 1960No. Civ. A. 18585PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNTON, District Judge.
The issue presented is a narrow one. Defendants have moved to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment as to paragraph 2 of the complaint. The complaint sets forth two separate and distinct causes of action. One cause of action is by plaintiff individually against defendants for personal injuries sustained as a result of a gas explosion. The second cause of action is by plaintiff as administrator of the estate of his wife for recovery under the Wrongful Death Act of the State of Indiana, Burns’ Ann. St. § 2-404, the death having occurred as á result of the same…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKnight v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1957
3Cited by20 opinions
- Karen Jean Hymer v. Benjamin K. Chal and Victoria Leilani ChaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Jacobson v. Atlantic City HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Luther W. Borror, Administrator of the Estate of Bonita Ann Curtician, Deceased v. Sharon Steel Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Hatridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Lucas v. Seagrave CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.