Legal Opinion

Rountree v. Marshall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1899No. Civil No. 672PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. 'Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.

This action was brought by the appellee herein on May 22, 1897, in the district court of Maricopa County, against the appellant and one Marcus Jacobs, to recover the possession of certain real estate, with the rents and profits thereof, stated to be worth the sum of fifty dollars per month, and asking that the title to the premises be quieted in the appellee, that he have possession thereof, and that a conveyance from one William Ruff to the appellant, Rountree, be declared fraudulent and void, and canceled as a cloud upon the title. The facts, as disclosed by the evidence, were as follows:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judson v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bull v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Bartles v. GibsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Ferguson v. RobertsArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Sackin v. KerstingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Mayo v. WickettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API