Legal Opinion
Hearst Publications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1943No. 10112, 10114, 10115, 10123Published
1Opinion of the Court
136 F.2d 608 (1943)
HEARST PUBLICATIONS, Inc.,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, and three other cases.
Nos. 10112, 10114, 10115, 10123.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 10, 1943.
Oscar Lawler, John M. Hall, A. Laurence Mitchell, all of Los Angeles, Cal. (Lawler, Felix & Hall, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for petitioner Hearst Publication.
Binford & Binford, L. B. Binford, and Howard M. Binford, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Stockholders Pub. Co., Inc.
Flint & MacKay, H. S. MacKay, Jr., and Edward L. Compton, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for Hearst Publications.
T. B.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.