Legal Opinion
Cordoba Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Maro Shipping Ltd.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1980No. Civ. A. B 79-506PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISSOLVE ATTACHMENT
EGINTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Cordoba Shipping Company (Cordoba), commenced this action in admiralty by filing a verified complaint and a request for an order of attachment against defendants Maro Shipping Ltd. (Maro) and International Traders Inc. (International). Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1333.
Plaintiff, a Panamanian corporation, alleged that it contracted with Maro, a Liberian corporation, for a time charter of the M.Y. Albaforth at a rate of $8,500 per day payable semi-monthly in advance. In addition, the charter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- McCreary Tire & Rubber Company v. Ceat S.P.A. v. Mellon Bank, N.A. GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bahrain Telecommunications Co. v. Discoverytel, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Pankau v. First State Bank of Harvard (In Re Pankau)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Nehring v. Steamship M/V Point VailCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Everspeed Enterprises Ltd. v. Skaarup Shipping Int'lDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Nehring v. Steamship M/V Point VailCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.