Legal Opinion

Nehring v. Steamship M/V Point Vail

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 22, 1990No. 89-3108PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COX, Circuit Judge:

Point Vail Company, defendant below, appeals from a judgment rendered against it in favor of the intervening plaintiffs Seafarers Trust Funds. Point Vail does not contest liability; rather, it contends that the district court erred in holding that the Funds could satisfy their judgment from a bond posted for release of the M/V Point Vail. Point Vail also appeals the denial of a post-trial motion in which it sought to have the judgment overturned and the case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. BACKGROUND

In January…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baltimore Line Handling Co. v. BrophyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. Linea Naviera De Cabotaje, C.A. v. Mar Caribe De Navegacion, C.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  3. Gary v. D. Agustini & Asociados, S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
  4. Nehring v. Steamship M/V Point VailCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Western Bulk Carriers (Australia), Pty. Ltd. v. P.S. International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API