Legal Opinion

Lowden v. Stephens County Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 16, 1942No. 30773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, C. J.

The only question presented is whether certain judgments rendered against the school district are void when tested for sufficiency to sustain' ad valorem tax levy.

The petition on which the judgment in favor of Lowe & Campbell Athletic Goods, Division of Wilson Sporting Goods Co., was rendered, was filed in the district court of Stephens county on June 27, 1940. Attached thereto and made a part thereof is an itemized account of the items purchased, together with certain payments theretofore made to plaintiff. This shows purchases made in 1929-30 and -31, and in 1938-39, and the last items…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Nordman v. School District No. 43Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. County Sanitation District Number OneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Tucker v. ZacharySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Choctaw County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Choctaw County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Tucker v. ZacharySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API