Legal Opinion
Douglas A. Scott v. PerkinElmer Health Sciences, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 10, 2026No. 5:24-cv-03389Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DOUGLAS A. SCOTT, Case No. 24-cv-03389-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND 9 v. CONVERTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS INTO MOTION FOR 10 PERKINELMER HEALTH SCIENCES, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND INC., GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 11 12 13 Defendant moves to dismiss all six of self-represented Plaintiff’s claims. See Dkts. 11 (the 14 “Motion”), 24 (the “Opposition”), 25. Plaintiff and Defendant have consented to the jurisdiction 15 of a magistrate judge, and the Court has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.