Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. . Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSchenck, J.

The defendant was found guilty and sentenced for violating chapter 241, Public-Local Laws of 1927, to wit: "An Act to define, regulate, and license real estate brokers and real estate salesmen; to create a State real estate commission and to provide a penalty for a violation of the provisions hereof," applicable to certain designated counties — 8 in number. The defendant contends that the act is unconstitutional. The sole question involved in this appeal: Is the act in controversy unconstitutional? We think so.

The Constitution of N.C. Art. I, sec. 7, is as follows: "No man or set of men are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hager v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Roman v. LobeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Glenn v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Bratton v. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Roller v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Duncan v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Brumley v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API