Legal Opinion
Chemical Bank of Rochester v. Ashenburg
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Emmett J. Schnepp,
Based upon the findings made by this court, the facts of the case can be stated briefly. Stanndco . Developers, Inc. (Stanndco), the developer of an apartment house project, formed a limited partnership to syndicate the sale of the project. The partnership, Meadowbrook Farm Apartments (Meadowbrook), consisted of 24 equal shares in the project of which one share was held by Stanndco, the sole general partner and managing agent of the partnership. The remaining shares were sold to the individual defendants, except Quigley, the cheif executive officer of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Bankers' Commercial Security Co. v. Piercy Corp. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. 0.35 of an Acre of Land, More or Less, Situated in Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BarnessDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Great Lakes-Dunbar-Rochester v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Chemical Bank v. HaskellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- County of Monroe v. Raytheon Co.New York Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.