Legal Opinion
Bankers' Commercial Security Co. v. Piercy Corp. of America
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Senn, Official Referee.
The plaintiff is a banking corporation doing business at 270 Madison avenue, New York.
The Piercy Corporation of America is named as a defendant, but was not served.
About May 8,1929, the defendant Snyder, a resident of Hamilton, *650N. Y., was interviewed by a representative of the Piercy Corporation, and induced to enter into a contract for the sale and distribution by him, within the county of Madison, of a product known as Piercy’s Live Stock Food Digester. He was to receive from the Piercy Corporation and pay for digesters amounting to $2,511, the same to be shipped to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- American Exchange National Bank v. New York Belting & Packing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- German-American Bank v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Becker v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chemical Bank of Rochester v. AshenburgNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Zweig v. SchwartzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Wright v. Board of Public Instruction for SumterSupreme Court of Florida · 1955