Legal Opinion
Chemical Bank v. Haskell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 1, 1979No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2; Appeal No. 3PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCHNEPP, J.
Appellants, John Haskell, Paddy Chayefsky, Halsey F. Sher*349wood and Arthur Giliotti, together with John F. Kelly and Edward Fine (not parties to the instant actions) are limited partners in Quarry Square Associates ("Quarry”), a limited partnership organized for the purpose of developing an apartment complex in Buffalo, New York. Stanndco Developers, Inc. ("Stanndco”), a real estate development corporation which organized the partnership, is a class A general partner of Quarry. Stanndco conducted its business by purchasing land, obtaining financing, searching out…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ward v. City Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hall v. Bank of BlasdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- First National Bank v. FazzariNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Chemical Bank of Rochester v. AshenburgNew York Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Executive House Realty v. HagenNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Alaska Continental Bank v. Anchorage Commercial Land AssociatesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Alaska Continental Bank v. Anchorage Commercial Land AssociatesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989