Legal Opinion
Bolmer v. McKulsky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 14, 2003No. AC 22435PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The plaintiff, Todd Bolmer, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after the jury’s verdict for the defendants, Christopher McKulsky, John McKulsky and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, now Travelers Property and Casualty Company (Travelers),1 on a claim of negligence arising out of an automobile accident. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) directed a verdict for the defendant on the plaintiffs claims of statutory and common-law recklessness, (2) excluded a portion of the deposition testimony of Abby Uszakiewicz, a passenger in the defendant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Bovat v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arnone v. Town of EnfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. WardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tisdale v. Riverside Cemetery Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Harrison v. HamziConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.