Legal Opinion
Andreason v. Felsted
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided May 11, 2006No. Case No. 20040800-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
1 1 This lawsuit arises out of a fraudulently altered agreement for a gym membership. Plaintiff Rod N. Andreason asks this court to reverse two summary judgment rulings and the dismissal of his lawsuit. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
BACKGROUND
12 In October 1999, Andreason entered into an agreement to purchase a membership in Gold's Gym of Provo, owned by Scott Felsted, Dean Viertel, and Troy Peterson (collectively, "Defendants"). Andreason correctly understood that his was to be a month-to-month membership agreement rather than a one- or two-year contract of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Softsolutions, Inc. v. Brigham Young UniversityUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Fericks v. Lucy Ann Soffe TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Smith v. BatchelorUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- DiNapoli v. CookeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2017
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.