Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Fuller Brush Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1975No. Nos. 75-1641, 75-1643PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Per curiam
In this proceeding, Consolidated Foods Corporation (Consolidated) questions orders of the district court (Judge Miles W. Lord) permitting certain former employees of the Fuller Brush Company, a division of Consolidated, to bring a class action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 on behalf of other employees similarly situated seeking compensation allegedly due under provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Consolidated seeks review of the orders establishing the class action by way of a petition for writ of mandamus against Judge Lord as well as through an appeal based on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. Terry Wayne Denson, Stephen Orlando and Joseph James Janish, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Shushan v. University of Colorado at BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- Pritchard v. Dent Wizard International Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Kinney Shoe Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Bob W. Vorhes and John A. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.