Legal Opinion

Bilbruck v. Valley County

District Court, D. Montana

Decided June 26, 2024No. 4:21-cv-00040Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION SADY BILBRUCK, Plaintiff, CV-21-40-GF-BMM vs. ORDER VALLEY COUNTY, LUKE STROMMEN, & JOHN DOES 1-3, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sady Bilbruck (“Bilbruck”) has filed motions for partial summary judgment related to issues of consent (Doc. 18; Doc. 52) and Defendant Luke Strommen’s (“Strommen”) prior conviction for sexual intercourse without consent with J.R. (Doc. 25.) Defendant Valley County (“Valley County”) opposes those motions. (Doc. 67 at 1–2; Doc. 88 at 1; Doc. 65 at 2.) Strommen also opposes those…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Saucier Ex Rel. Mallory v. McDonald's Restaurants of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dauven v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API