Legal Opinion
CALDERWOOD v. RINSCH
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 28, 2022No. 2:22-cv-02847Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GARY D. CALDERWOOD : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 22-2847 : CARL ERIK RINSCH : MEMORANDUM Juan R. Sánchez, C.J. November 28, 2022 Plaintiff Gary D. Calderwood brings this diversity action against Carl Erik Rinsch for declaratory relief, breach of contract, and promissory estoppel, all arising out of an art deal gone bad. Rinsch moves to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Although Calderwood plausibly alleges breach of contract and promissory estoppel claims, his claim for declaratory…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- John Doe v. University of the SciencesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.