Legal Opinion

Imperato v. Lowe

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 1, 1941No. 38PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

The question here presented is whether or not “tender” is equivalent to “payment” under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, § 22, 33 U.S. C.A. § 922, limiting the period during which a party may seek the reopening and review of an award of compensation under the act to “any time prior to one year after the date of the last payment of compensation.”

From the agreed facts it appears that appellant was injured on January 7, 1936, while employed as a longshoreman' by appellee Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd., and that after the payment of voluntary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Bronson v. RodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Lewis v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  4. Leet v. ArmbrusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Wright v. John A. Robinson & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meredith v. Shawver Graham, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Meredith v. Shawver Graham, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Meredith v. Shawver Graham, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API