Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Simpson v. Iowa State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 25, 1972No. 54650Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUhlenhopp, Justice

May a landowner remove gravel or other materials from land adjoining a highway to an extent which causes the highway to subside or in other ways damages the highway? The long-standing and universal rule ,of the common law is that he may not. When the public originally obtains the highway right-of-way, it acquires, under the law, the right to have the highway supported by the adjoining land. This right of support inheres in the original compensation award for the right-of-way. The same principle applies to acquisitions of rights-of-way by common carriers.

I. Following are typical statements of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Beal v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Liddick v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of JackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. New York Steam Co. v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Breisch v. Locust Mountain Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API