Liddick v. City of Council Bluffs
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.
For brevity and clarity, the City of Council Bluffs and its defending officers, and the Iowa State Highway Commission and its defending members, will be referred to, respectively, as the “City,” and as the “Commission.” This ease was tried below, and comes to this court, by somewhat irregular procedure. It was instituted by the plaintiffs and the defendants as a “test” case. While it was -alleged in the petition, and admitted in the answers, that the viaduct will be constructed unless the defendants are enjoined, it appears from the record that these allegations were simply for the- purpose…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Crane v. HahloSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lahr v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Bormann v. KOSSUTH COUNTY BD. OF SUP'RSSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.