Legal Opinion
Imperial Appliance Corporation v. Hamilton Manufacturing Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 3, 1970No. 18039PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Chief Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal brought by Hamilton Manufacturing Company pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The sole question for review is whether the district court correctly ruled that jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) to entertain a patent infringement suit brought by Imperial Appliance Corporation against Hamilton. We affirm.
The facts, which are reported fully in two prior opinions of the district court. Imperial Appliance Corp. v. Hamilton Mfg. Co., 263 F.Supp. 1015 (E.D.Wis. 1967), and Imperial Appliance Corp. v. Hamilton Mfg. Co., 239 F.Supp. 175 (E.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Excelsior Wooden Pipe Co. v. Pacific Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diematic Manufacturing Corp. v. Packaging Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Consolidated Kinetics Corp. v. Marshall, Neil & Pauley, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Minatronics Corp. v. Buchanan Ingersoll P.C., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1996