Legal Opinion
Consolidated Kinetics Corp. v. Marshall, Neil & Pauley, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 6, 1974No. 1572-1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
Plaintiff sued defendants to enjoin them from manufacturing and selling a certain type of compressed fiberglass vibration isolation pad in violation of a contract between the parties dated August 9, 1967. Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing its action.
Plaintiff Consolidated Kinetics Corporation (Kinetics) and Marshall, Neil & Pauley, Inc., and Air Control, Inc., its selling agent, (Marshall) are competitors in noise and vibration isolation systems for use in the building industry. Kinetics is the owner of U.S. Patent 3,095,187 (T87) dated June 25, 1963, describing an apparatus for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Speedco, Incorporated v. Donald EstesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Minatronics Corp. v. Buchanan Ingersoll P.C., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1996
- MGA, INC v. LaSALLE MACHINE TOOL, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Benanav v. Healthy Paws Pet Insurance LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.